The initial chapter on the Post Office dealt with the establishment of a postal service in Port Elizabeth following its inception in Cape Town and extension to Uitenhage and, by implication, to Algoa Bay before 1828 whereas this blog deals with the postal service from the appointment of the hamlet’s second Postmaster, George Ubsdell in 1828 until the resignation of the Postmistress, Mrs Biggar, the third Postmaster after William Dunn and Ubsdell.
Main picture: The first dedicated Post Office in Port Elizabeth in the building with the picket fence
Dunn’s replacement in January 1828 was an 1820 Settler by the name of George Ubsdell. He had farmed his allotted land in Albany until he was forced to leave and find work in Port Elizabeth. Apart from being Postmaster from 1828 to 1840, as the annual salary of £40 was insufficient to live on and the quantity of mail sparse, Ubsdell occupied various other positions simultaneously: Port officer, vendue clerk and tide waiter. Interestingly, he was also the oldest apothecary in the Cape Colony in 1871.
Expansion of the service
In line with the phenomenal increase in the growth of the town, the utilisation of the postal service also increased substantially. This was aided by the fact that in 1836 Port Elizabeth became a free warehousing port. From a revenue of £140 4s 0d in 1840, it surged to £531 8s 8d in 1841. By this time, the postal service within the Cape Colony had become fairly regular, rapid and inexpensive. The main post road ran from Cape Town, through Caledon, Swellendam, George, Uitenhage to Grahamstown, the total distance being 1046kms. At the post cart’s normal speed of 9.6 km/hr, this meant that by leaving Cape Town every Friday evening, it would reach Grahamstown on the following Thursday morning. The mail would reach Port Elizabeth on the Wednesday after it had been deposited at the Post Office in Uitenhage. By employing cross posts [probably now called cross docking], communication by means of letter had become convenient and certain.
As the volumes increased, and hence productivity improved, the cost of mail declined. By this time, the cost of a single-sheet letter from Cape Town to the service’s terminus in Grahamstown had now been reduced to one shilling, with the charge for intermediate locations being pro rata the distance travelled. The exception to this rule was periodicals on which a tariff of one penny was applied whatever the distance travelled. Letters directed to Europe or any other foreign destinations were levied at 4p for the ship conveyance portion of the charge. Generally, post reached England within eight to ten weeks with the return of post between Port Elizabeth and England being between five and six months. That meant that a letter could be dispatched from and its reply received in either location within that period.
Mrs Biggar’s tenure
It was in 1840 that a fundamental change would be made to the Postal Service in Port Elizabeth. As the quantity of mail to Port Elizabeth had increased significantly, it was deemed necessary that the Post Office be established in its own building. Furthermore, it was proposed that the time had come for the Post Master to be devoted exclusively to his postal duties. The incumbent would not be allowed to have any sidelines which would interfere with his postal duties as in the past. But whilst the Government exacted full-time duties from its humble postal official, it would not relent on its meagre salary of £40 per annum. No man could be expected to exist on such a paltry salary especially if they were married. Hence, it was with a heavy heart that George Ubsdell would be obliged to resign as Post Master after twelve years in the post. It was only a married female who could subsist on this remuneration. Thus, it was that Mrs. Mary Biggar would fill the post by commencing her duties on the 17th December 1840.
Instead of the multipurpose building – probably more like a shack – that was previously afforded the grandiose title of Post Office Building, the Post Office would now be housed in its own more appropriate and official building. For this purpose a house on the southern, Baakens Street side of the future town hall was acquired. This was a two-storeyed house, located at the foot of Castle Hill, and enclosed by a low fence. It was built in the early Settler style with whitewashed walls and the ubiquitous red-tiled roof flanked by two squat chimneys, whilst at the rear were the usual outhouses and stables. Much like in modern day British hamlets, the rooms downstairs served as the Post Office whilst the upstairs rooms served as the accommodation of the Postmistress and her husband. Flanking it on the right-hand side was the tumble-down jail overseen by the dutiful gaoler, Thomas Sterley. This building had been used in this capacity since the early Settler days. Across the road, on the other corner of Castle Hill road, was the printing firm of Messrs. Richards, Impey & Co.
Above: Schedule of the main residents in Port Elizabeth in 1848. Note that the Gaoler, Thomas Sterling, received an annual salary of £45 per annum compared with Mrs Biggar who received £40 per annum.
In spite of ever-increasing volumes of mail and hence work, the amiable and industrious Mrs Biggar faithfully discharged her duties as postmistress at the derisory pittance of £40 per annum. No additional assistance was provided to her to recompense her for her efforts nor was any recognition offered to her in her endeavours.
A visitor to Port Elizabeth in 1848 after an absence of ten years, had been appalled at the slave-like conditions that were being visited upon Mrs Biggar and raised his concerns. In disgust, he penned the following letter to the Eastern Province Herald under the moniker “Philanthropist”:
“Some ten years ago when I first came to the Colony, I passed a few months in Port Elizabeth which appeared to me on my arrival, I remember, as scarcely more than a village. On revisiting it now, I have been struck with the great improvement visible in every direction… A few days since, with my mind agreeably occupied with the change that I beheld, I made my way to the Post Office in [my] quest of intelligence from [my] absent friends. My letters were handed to me by the Postmistress, whose mourning garb indicated that she was now a widow. Under the impulse of the moment, and with an apology for a question that from a stranger was, perhaps, not a discreet one. I asked her what had been her increase in salary since she had held the office she filled. I learnt that during the eight years [that] she had been Postmistress, the receipts (notwithstanding the reduction in the amount of postage [cost]) had about doubled, while (besides £12 per annum allowed as rent for an office- little enough where, I hear, rents are high) her salary amounted to only £40 a year, a trifle more than two shillings a day [that] I have been accustomed to pay a Fingo in my garden. And for this miserable stipend, is this lady, it appears, expected to devote all her time and attention to the duties of her office. Ought such things to be? It is very possible that if she gave it up because [she is] underpaid, other might be found whose fortunes are at so low an ebb that they would be ready to undertake the duties [that] she relinquished for the same insufficient payment. But is this the view [that] the liberal government ought to take in such matters?
It is interesting to note that my great-great grandfather, the Rev Francis McCleland of 7 Castle Hill, the first clergyman at St Mary’s Church and an 1820 Settler, also experienced a similar problem as the Postmaster. In his case, his salary of £200 per annum remained fixed for the period 1835 until his death in 1853. Unlike the docile, placid Mrs Biggar, my ancestor did not take his salary situation with equanimity. Instead he badgered all manner of officials including the Duke of Wellington, but all to no avail. Since that was the case, what were the chances that a lowly Postmaster, and a female to boot, would achieve any increment?
Above: Mary’s Church in the 1850s and Main Street with its double storey buildings comprising a shop on the ground floor and living accommodation on the first floor.
In those days the postal service operated on a counter-to-counter basis. By that is implied that there were no postmen and that the residents had to call at the Post Office themselves in order to collect their mail. Furthermore, Port Elizabeth, in spite of its increasing prosperity, was not on the main postal route which bypassed Port Elizabeth by being routed through Uitenhage. Only by the time of Mrs Biggar was this remedied when a mail service was instituted between Cape Town and Port Elizabeth. This came overland by special post cart in a four-foot square box and took about three days, travelling by day and night in relays.
Mail between Uitenhage and Port Elizabeth was carried by messengers. The death of one such messenger was reported in the Herald as follows:
“We regret to make it known that the postboy who carries the mail from this place to Uitenhage was drowned in crossing [the] Chatty River (Bethelsdorp), a small stream generally, but by the late rains, very much swollen. The mail bag was found at the bottom of the river, and by order of Mr. John Kitchingham, returned to this place late on Thursday night. The Postmistress caused it immediately to be opened and all the letters to be laid out on the tables and floors. Many of these letters, especially of the small inland mails, had become almost a pulp, and although carefully dried, would yet afterwards, we fear, be very illegible.”
Painting from 1851 by engineer Henry Fancourt White of White’s Road fame with the Post Office surrounded by a wooden fence
The state of the overland mail from Cape Town was frequently a cause for complaint. On the 12th February, 1846, one such complaint was voiced in the Herald as follows:
“The wet state in which the letters have several times of late been received here, from Cape Town especially, should induce, we think, the Postmaster-General to adopt some new methods with the post bags by which letters may be more effectually protected from the rains. Instead of using old tattered pieces of torn paper and worn out canvas, he might go to the expense of having proper waterproof cloth covers into which the mail might be effectually sealed or tied [so] that no water could ever reach the letters.”
“We cannot believe that the expenses would be so very lavish that the department could not bear them, and if Mr. Crozier would just throw out a hint that he would accept as a present a supply of waterproof cloth, we feel assured that some habit-maker or hat manufacturer who may deal in the article would at once present him with a few pieces.”
It was not only the state of the mail after its overland journey that drew vociferous complaints; it was also the delays in delivery which raised the ire of residents. These were becoming frequent for numerous reasons. Whereas when the mail service was first instituted, delays in delivery were accepted as the norm, with a regular “professional” service being implemented, the standards anticipated, nay demanded, by the residents were raised.
In one instance the post from Port Elizabeth to Grahamstown was detained by upwards of fourteen hours. It left the Bay on Friday evening at six o’clock but the following morning the bags were brought in from a short distance outside the town where they had been retrieved from a drunken post boy. This courier in a state of complete intoxication, had fallen from his horse and then fallen asleep by the roadside leaving the mail bags in the middle of the track. With brandy and wine being cheap, alcohol abuse was rife amongst the working classes as was evidenced by the number of taverns operating in the seedier parts of town such as Strand Street.
Vocal complaints were raised by the residents to the Postmaster-General without satisfaction. By 1851, critics were more open and scathing in their condemnation of the Postmaster-General who was not entirely culpable for the chaotic state of the mail.
“It is reported, a short time since in the public papers, that the Postmaster General is about to retire from his post. If he feels his strength insufficient to enable him to work his department, we opine [that] it may force itself upon him as a duty at once to withdraw. We trust that it is not his disposition to excite expectations, however, which he means not or may not have it in his power to fulfil. Not two months ago, he held out to the Bayonians the hope of local letter-carriers. The annexed reply to a memorial on that subject will show how far he has redeemed his partial pledge”.
“’Reply to certain inhabitants of Port Elizabeth – Requesting that two letter-carriers may be appointed to the Post Office at Port Elizabeth: Memorialists are informed that His Excellency the Governor regrets his inability to acceded to their request
12th May 1851 Colonial Office”
Being 70 years old at the time, Mrs. Mary Biggar left the employ of the Post Office on the 31st August 1852 having been the third occupant of this office.
1. Tide-waiter is defined as a “customs officer who boards ships to enforce regulations.”
(The Penguin Concise English Dictionary, 1995, Claremont Books, London.)
2. A vendue clerk is a clerk at an auction or a public sale